What was actually signed? EU and Ukraine

March 24, 2014

A couple of days ago I raised the question of what could possibly go wrong relating to the signing of the political Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine.

What I didn’t actually state was what – specifically – has been signed between the two parties.

Firstly the preamble was signed.  Thereafter Article I, Article II and Article VII  were signed.  That is it.  No more.

All other Articles of the Association Agreement remain unsigned.

None of these Articles – signed or otherwise – are likely to be ratified by anybody until elections returning unquestioned legitimacy to the Ukrainian political class have taken place – both presidential and parliamentary.  That being so, all outstanding Articles are likely to be signed only once those legitimacy issues have been dealt with.

Thus the document ratification in its entirety – and therefore having full legal force and unambiguous obligations for both parties – seems unlikely to occur much before the year end.  And that time scale is on the presumption that all EU Member States provide a legislative slot to ratify the document in their busy domestic affairs.

Naturally the symbolic nature of the signature, the commitment to political direction are there to be seen – perhaps necessarily so in the circumstances Ukraine finds itself within.  Of course everybody wants to be seen to be doing something – the question is whether there is actually anything sensible that can be done now?  It will appear that “form” remains far greater than legally binding “substance” to many.  Is that sensible?

You cannot help but feel that the current interim Ukrainian government and media are being somewhat disingenuous regarding just how robust this legal anchor to the EU actually is.  A particularly dangerous thing to do considering continued public anger and distrust toward the political class.  The truth will certainly “out” prior to any elections and the damage to certain candidates and/or parties may lead to some very unpredictable and possibly volatile public reactions.

Only one nation stands to gain from that scenario – and that nation is not Ukraine.



  1. Should the EU even be signing agreements with a transitional, un-elected government?

    • I raised that question (along with a few others) in the link to a previous entry. I suspect these 3 Articles were the maximum they were prepared to sign under the current domestic political circumstances. No doubt they would have preferred to wait until after elections to do anything but I suspect the pressure from Ukraine and from the media etc demanded they be seen to “do something” – even if that “something” really isn’t “anything” as appears to be the case now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: