Time to seriously consider the exit

February 21, 2014

No. no.  I am not considering exiting Ukraine – nothing so dramatic.  It’s home for all that is good and bad about it, and here I will remain regardless.

I am referring to the mounting body count for which the authorities, having far greater resources at their control, have to take the brunt of responsibility for.

I recognise of course, that there are elements within those protesting who are also responsible for deaths, provocation and injuries.  I also recognise that neither the authorities nor opposition politicians have very much – if any – control over the actions of these elements.

When large numbers of protesters are expected to abide by a truce negotiated between a deeply unpopular president and a merely tolerated (but not followed) opposition, it is wishful thinking to expect it to last – and so it has transpired that last it did not.  Deaths in double figures today once more.

However, the more extreme elements do not exist in significant strength or depth – they are not a match for the full and unmitigated the machinery of the institutions of state when all is said and done.  Whatever these elements can do, the institutions of state are more than capable of a response far more disproportionate to incidents to which they are reacting – ergo the authorities that control the institutions of state must carry the largest burdens of responsibility – provoked or otherwise.

Thus as the body count of both protesters and police continues to rise on an almost daily basis, the ultimate responsibility is that of the President.

Clearly the Rubicon has been crossed by both State and society and clearly society cannot offer its resignation to calm matters – certainly not to authorities with a totalitarian outlook and little regard for the due processes of rule of law.

Thus there is but one way to avoid a bloodbath becoming a humanitarian disaster – and that is for the current president to be encouraged to exit the political stage – swiftly – for the sake of the nation.  Quite clearly a national unity government operating under the current constitution rather than that of 2004 would be rather pointless as it would be powerless via a vis presidential whim.  The “western choice” to lead Party of Regions during this time of transition is clearly Sergey Tigipko – a man more than capable of working with the opposition in a national unity government.

This tweet echoing conversations I had in Kyiv with a couple of diplomats at the end of last year.

There is perhaps also a lesson to be learned from Mr Putin’s time in office, in that he consistently backs losers in Ukraine.  He backed Yanukovych overtly in 2004 and got Yushenko.  He tacitly backed Tymoshenko in 2010 and got Yanukovych.  Russian support for Yanukovych now, given its track record of backing Ukrainian losers is ominous – though expecting Russia to whisper in the presidential ear that it is time to head for a negotiated exit is clearly out of the question until a suitable alternative has been identified – if one can be identified – to put the Russian colours behind.

Thus it will fall to “blunt private conversations” with both president and those that surround him, to encourage his negotiated exit – whether that mean an immunity from prosecution guaranteed by an external actor, the retention of ill-gotten gains, a quiet life in the gilded cage of his Mezhyhirya home – whatever.

Solutions to the Ukrainian crisis are few, as are the rapidly reducing future options of the current president when it comes to a very quiet retirement somewhere other than prison as the body count continues to rise.

Perhaps it is time to quietly but robustly offer a negotiated way out now.


  1. Plus what about Putin’s options? How much of the POR does he or could he control? Could torpedo any kind of plan based on the moderates on both side coming together if it’s based on signing the AA?

    • It is impossible to put a number on those that could be controlled by the Kremlin. Would Akhmetov allow his to be used by the Kremlin? If so that is “x” number, Tigipoko? Klyiev? Firtash etc? Between those 4 there are close to 100 MPs. The issue though is reliability. How much of how much goets to the oligarchy when Russian throws a few billion at the leadership to keep it onside. How much does it allow the oligarchy to dump product-wise that Russia doesn’t really need but will purchase to keep them onside. Does all that add up to enough to tip the balance his way vis a vis what could be frozen European bank accounts, removed Visas or passports, wife and kids sent back to Ukraine persona non grata, that expensive schooling at that prestigious foreign school ended, and fond memories of that mansion in Staltsburg that you own but cannot visit or sell as it has become a frozen asset.

  2. as are the rapidly reducing future options of the current president when it comes to a very quiet retirement

    What about all his cronies? Minister of Interior, General Prosecutor, son etc, and even oligarchs. Maybe they’re getting the feeling that if they don’t hang together they’ll all hang separately.

    • The oligarchs will be OK – They always make a point of good relations with those within all political parties. With only one or perhaps two exceptions, they have no problem with a change of regime. Certainly the likes of Akhmetov will not suffer. The Minister of Interior and Prosecutor however cannot run so easily. Apparently sons of Yanukovych are currently on a jet outside Ukrainian airspace though that is not definite. Most of the Party of Regions MPs however, will be fine as to be quite honest, everybody knows they have no influence on the inner circle. It will be interesting to see which of their number go into hiding/flee and which stay visible and try to resurrect the current catastrophe. Ukraine needs the likes of Tigipko from Party Regions to stay as he is somebody the opposition can work with.

      • Ukrainee needs the likes of Tigipko from Party Regions to stay as he is somebody the opposition can work with.

        I get the feeling that’s providing the opposition has a leader that can start leading and stop following and looking right, left and over his shoulder at his rivals and mistress.

  3. Reblogged this on With No Rush.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: