Ukraine adopts new Criminal Procedures Code (after a few amendments)

April 18, 2012

Sometime around 1995 Ukraine promised the Council of Europe/PACE that upon entry to that particular club, it would sort out the due process, from arrest through to sentencing of existing procedures within Ukraine.  By 0400 in the morning of 14th April 2012, it kept that promise, assuming the President doesn’t veto it when it reaches him for signature.

Now it would be quite wrong to have a go at the current government for eventually keeping the promises Ukraine made to the Council of Europe about 17 years ago.  However, despite now eventually keeping a promise that could and should have been kept within a few years of making that promise, the current government are about the be on the wrong end of a keyboard lashing relating to the new Criminal Procedures Code anyway.

Why?  Well obviously if you are going to make significant changes to the criminal procedures of Ukraine throughout every step of the process and accounting for as many existing and probably contrary laws and procedures along the way when drafting such a document, it is going to be a rather weighty tome.

It is something that will take a lot of preparation and a huge amount of due diligence in order to present to parliament something that needs little amendment when meeting the requirements of Ukraine and receiving the blessing of the Council of Europe.

In fact so weighty and critically important to Ukraine is the new Criminal Procedures Code, it began being debated in the RADA on 10th April and continued to be debated until 0400 on 14th April.  Bravo you would say.  Dedication, scrutiny and an end result.  Caps duly doffed to the original creators of the new code.

Well you would until you realise that there were 4000 amendments made to the new code during that debate.

No that is not a typo, there were F O U R  T H O U S A N D amendments made during the time it took to pass through the RADA!

Now you may share my concerns that whatever reaches the president may very well be subject to a veto and thus the Ukrainian promise to the Council of Europe made so very long ago may still not be met.

Seriously, 4000 amendments with a 4 day long debate finishing at 0400 and a vote passing the code?  Nobody thinks that any of those amendments will have counterproductive results somewhere else within that new code when very tired (and generally academically retarded) MPs try and force through a major piece of legislation before they went on their Easter break?

Go take a sizable instruction manual and then make 4000 amendments to it at 0400 in the morning, then come back and look at it after a long weekend and see if it is seamless and perfect all the way through.

What if amendment 357 means that amendment 2956 creates a diametrically opposed procedure?  What if amendment number 1564 means you really should create yet another amendment which you did not consider in the original text because there is now some serious ambiguity and unnecessary wiggle room in the new code?

Having waited 17 years or so to keep this promise to the Council of Europe and do the right thing by the people of Ukraine, after 4000 amendments, (which implies to me either the original draft was absolutely dire or the MPs have created amendments in their own interests), a further month or so studying the new code complete with the 4000 amendments may have been a wise thing to do prior to voting it through the RADA?  More haste and less speed?

How much of the original draft still resembles the original draft after 4000 amendments?

No law is ever perfect, but seriously, you have to doubt the standard of what we may very well be about to receive.  It may well be better than what we currently have, but you have to suspect it will fall a long way short of what it could have been.

Let’s see what happens.  After all, even if it is an almost perfect new Criminal Procedures Code, it still has to be implemented and that is something Ukraine can never manage to do.  Already government ministers are saying it will be a step by step process to bring this code in.

In the meantime, let injustice continue despite the new code?


  1. Except for correctly noting the 4,000 amendment monstrosity, your post is a somewhat dishonest assessment.

    Fact – the Party of Regions, with Chechetov waving his stubby little arms as usual, “conducting” the vote, rammed this monstrosity through using – what else – “piano voting.” That means that 1 little sovok mafia thug voted for 5 sovok mafia thugs, who were not present, by using voting cards in neighboring slots.

    Second – where is the jury? There is none. Andrew Portnov made the rounds of the talks shows to blabber excuses about why there is no jury, despite the fact that Zookraine’s constitution mandates jury trials.

    Why no juries? Because that takes away power from the sovok mafia thugs and their appointed chimps-in-robes “judges.”

    There’s plenty more – but those examples are sufficient.

    Psychotic, demented sovok mafia thugs in Zookraine corrupt everything they touch.

    And the Council of Europe did not provide any “blessing.”

  2. Dear RADAITES:

    WOW! I stand in awe of your achievement — 4000 amendments in 4 days. Yet you can’t get our P.R. paperwork streamlined and implemented. (10 minute job, one day implementation).

    The O.B. is correct, you should have run the model through analysis to check for conflicts and go back and get it done properly. But then you can’t even fill a pothole in the road properly. Or actually lay concrete that doesn’t crumble after a few years, just like our laws.

    The sad thing about Ukraine is that you refuse to ASK anyone outside Ukraine for advice, probably for fear of being laughed at — some macho ego thing I am sure. ASKiING for help doesn’t make you seem stupid, it only proves that you are interested in getting advice from a system that works, it will go along way for the future if things are done right the first time*. Re-inventing the wheel every time you want to use it is what makes you look stupid.

    Now we have to suffer through 4000 more uneducated guesses and trip over self interest loopholes which like potholes will not get filled properly.


    * This always ends up increasing revenue, something you all are so interested in. More revenue = more money to skim off the top. Yes?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: