Archive for April 12th, 2009

h1

Darwinian Theory – From Supermodel to Babooshka…….An Evolutionary Process?

April 12, 2009

This is a light-hearted look at Darwin’s theory and how the physically appealing beauties of Odessa, which are found anywhere and everywhere here, turn into Babooshka……..and an attempt to track this evolutionary process.

darwin-1

Ok – The Origin of The Species by Charles Darwin, written way back in 1859, outlined the principle of “Natural Selection”…….or as the philosopher Herbert Spencer put it “Survival of the fittest”.

If we are to follow this line of thought, that would mean that the “inferior human gene pool” would be disappearing around us all the time…….except of course, that “civilised behaviour” and “social responsibility” make the human race buck the trend of nature, by supporting those less fortunate (for whatever reason) than ourselves.

We will start from the basis, (which is factually correct), that there are 10 women for every 9 men in Ukraine…….and therefore Odessa does not significantly deviate from this in any direction……..over the period of the last 3 or 4 generations.

darwin-9

Now whilst this is a jovial attempt to follow Darwin’s theory through……..these differences in numbers have been caused by serious occurrences, none of which should be subjected to any form of wit or derision……such as the forced starvation of Ukrainians (not exclusively, Russians and Belorussians also died in large numbers) by Stalin in 1932-33.   Ukraine lost an estimated 10 million people through starvation. 

We can also add into this mix the huge death toll of the male population during World War II.  Of the 60 million deaths in WWII……30 million were Russian…..although only 14.5 million were serving soldiers.  By way of comparison, Germany lost 2.8 million soldiers, the USA 0.46 million and the UK 0.4 million.

The math is not finished here of course, we then add another 2 million, predominantly men, killed as “enemies of the State” during the Soviet era.

In total we have now lost, by taking 50% male deaths from the starvation and “enemies of the State” figures……which will be conservative of course……and 100% of the soldiers killed……..plus 50% of the other casualties suffered here in WWII………meaning the death over a period of the last 80 years amounting to 43.25 million men from these parts.

darwin-2

To hop back another generation we then of course hit the population losses from the Soviet Revolution of 8.8 million and World War I, a further 3.2 million……both figures including civilian casualties and do not separate genders.

Needless to say, the deaths of the male of the species far outweigh those of the female…….such is the nature of war and human madness even today…….giving us to understand just why there is far more women than men here.

Ok………history lesson and lecture over…….it’s time to return to the juvenility for which you read my blog.

Taking the principle of “natural selection”…….it follows that with females far out-numbering males here……ugly women just “don’t get any” and therefore over the past 80 years, the “Ugly Gene” has started to become extinct, as per the theory, in the female of the species in this region……..despite a male, ugly or not, continuing to play “hide the sausage” due to inequality of the numbers and produce children.

darwin-3

Am I talking shite?……..Well, maybe………but it cannot be denied that the women in Ukraine and Russia……and particularly Odessa are extremely attractive……..and well known world wide for being so.  It is also true………and you only need walk down any street here……..that no matter how ugly the men are, and some really do look like a Bulldog which has liked a thistle……., they have an extremely beautiful woman with them. 

In fact, if I was a Slavic woman, I would invest in a “Rampant Rabbit”…….battery operated obviously……..well you never know when the electricity will go off here!!

darwin-4

So, back to the point……..over the past 80 to 100 years, employing the theory of “Natural Selection”……only the pretty ladies have been “bonked” and had children…..of those female children, only the pretty ones have also been “bonked” etc etc……..leading to an extreme amount of pretty, fertile females for the lesser number of males to chose between………and the not so pretty ones left with their “Rampant Rabbit.”

What?………No, it can’t be that bad to be a “not so pretty female”………..let’s face it, a “Rampant Rabbit” will not orgasm first, fart, scratch it’s bollocks, roll over and start snoring before she even gets “warmed up!!”

darwin-5

Neither will a “Rampant Rabbit” play away from home……..unless it is lent to somebody of course.

A “Rampant Rabbit” also cannot make you pregnant…..thus further removing the continued regeneration of the “less than pretty” gene……..obviously.

The inherent problem with being a “pretty female” is that there are so many of them…….and even if your man is uglier than a bucket of puke, should you start to lose you “sparkle”, he can find another model……..which would need less ironing to remove the wrinkles which stubbornly remain……..despite the $100 little tub of wrinkle removing cream…….which of course is a con…….Don’t get me started on the cosmetics industry bullshit they sell to women!!!

This, of course, takes care of the “usual argument” which states, after she gets married she stops trying…..which is of course nonsense…….at least here, as the competition is still fierce.

All of the above stated, even though light-heartedly and simplistically outlined, does not explain why somebody as beautiful as this…………

darwin-7

turns into somebody as “homely” as this………

darwin-8

………even taking into account age and life’s normal wear and tear.

I cannot account for the evolutionary process by way of Darwin’s theory or that of Herbert Spencer…….Are there other “super-natural” forces at work here?

%d bloggers like this: